This asynchronous syllabus review checklist was developed to include recommended course design practices relevant to most teaching environments at USC; it is editable so that schools may add or delete items to customize it to their needs.
Flowcharts outlining faculty peer-evaluation processes
Let’s look at some common myths about PRT and explore the realities behind those myths.
This is a guide for both the instructor submitting student work samples, and the reviewer evaluating the instructor’s graded student work samples.
A teaching statement is a written reflection by a faculty member on their teaching experience. This document is a guide for reviewing a faculty peer’s teaching statement. The guide can be adjusted to accommodate school-specific requirements. Faculty preparing their teaching statements for review should have access to the associated template prior to their statement submission.
Use this template to guide the content of your Teaching Statement.
Use this template to guide the content of your Teaching Statement.
Use this template to guide the content of your Teaching Statement.
Overview of a generalized process for accomplishing faculty peer review.
Questions for faculty observing a peer’s class to evaluate the active learning taking place in an onground or synchronous online class. Active learning are activities in which students practice course concepts during class.
Center for Excellence in Teaching