Associates Award for Excellence in Teaching: Evaluation

Nominations will be evaluated by a committee of distinguished faculty, including past winners of the Associates Award for Excellence in Teaching.

The Committee will be evaluating nominations based upon evidence of all four of the following:

  • High intellectual standards and rigor reflected in course design and instruction
  • Currency in the field reflected in course content and evidence-based instructional practices
    • Some examples are content that includes the latest developments in the field; discipline-endorsed pedagogical practices; a pattern of investment in teaching development training; etc.
  • Teaching strategies that encourage active student participation in the teaching-learning process 
    • Some examples are active learning strategies; innovative uses of technology/multimedia that enhance student learning; engagement with students outside of class/office hours; practices that encourage student questions, student-to-student teaching or peer-review; etc.
  • Incorporation of teaching practices that foster equitable and inclusive educational experiences
    • Some examples are syllabus language, course policies, and practices that are inclusive of students from all backgrounds; efforts to provide access to no- or low-cost, ADA compliant materials; course material from diverse scholars; applications, cases, and imagery represent diverse experiences; etc.

The committee will also be evaluating nominations based on evidence of one or more of the following:

  • Exceptional effort in providing enriched learning experiences
    • Some examples are exposing students to eminent leaders in the field, field trips, or immersion experiences; engaging students in theory development, experimentation, replication studies, or unsolved problems in the field; industry-based class projects or expositions; participation in public service or policy development; student-community partnerships; class projects that address societal barriers and increase access to opportunities; etc.
  • A pattern of inspiring students to further their learning or take action toward change
    • Some examples are a pattern of students changing their major, engaging in further education or scholarship in a discipline, joining community action groups, pursuing public service, engaging in student leadership, etc. as a direct result of their work with the nominee.
  • A pattern of significant impact on student development and outcomes, as measured by the discipline
    • Some examples are student licensing exam performance; student award and grant winners; student publications or presentations; student placement in highly sought after internships, expositions, artistic performances, graduate programs, jobs, etc.
  • Engaging students in scholarship, particularly in programs where this opportunity is relatively rare
  • Teaching impact at USC beyond the nominee’s own students
    • Some examples are leadership resulting in changes in a department’s student outcomes or patterns of improvement in colleagues’ teaching experience; leading transformative teaching initiatives for high-enrollment, multi-section GE courses; leading evidence-based program curriculum revision; use of data to inform curricular adjustments to better serve students, etc.
  • Leadership in the enhancement of teaching excellence within the department, school, or university
    • Some examples are a key role in planning/implementing teaching initiatives; facilitating teaching development programming; serving as a peer-reviewer of teaching evaluation for colleagues, etc.
  • Extraordinary, unique, or pioneering contributions to excellence in higher education teaching (beyond USC)
    • Some examples are a serving as a highly sought-after expert in inclusive teaching practices in higher education; developing a widely-adopted teaching approach in a discipline; authoring of a widely-used book on innovative, evidence-based higher education teaching practices; etc.

Successful nomination packets include evidence from formative or summative evaluations from at least one of following sources:

  • A school’s established peer-review teaching evaluation processes
  • Letters from peer-reviewers who have observed or reviewed the nominee’s teaching first hand
  • Evidence established by external reviewers used in the school’s peer-review teaching evaluation process

Additional information on the Associates Awards for Excellence in Teaching can be found at: http://cet.usc.edu/awards-grants/associates/.

All materials must be received by October 8, 2021. Nominations are for a single year’s cycle only.

Please fill out a nomination form to upload the complete dossier for your nominee.

If you have any questions, please contact Ellen Nagamine at enagamin@usc.edu.

CET is here to support your teaching and course design.
Schedule a consultation or ask us a question!

Contact Us

Institutes

CET institutes engage faculty in advancing their knowledge of scholarly approaches to teaching excellence.

Learn More

Services

CET promotes a vibrant culture of teaching and learning with consults, Faculty Learning Communities, and the Mentored Teaching Fellows program.

Learn More

Resources

Explore resources related to course design, evaluation, and instruction.

Learn More