Promoting critical thinking (and discouraging plagiarism) through oral advocacy assignments

Oral advocacy activities can help students improve their critical thinking skills and even discourage plagiarism! Antonio Elefano, Professor (Teaching) of Writing, USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, describes how he incorporates oral argument assignments in his classes in the latest What a Great Teaching Idea.

Professor Elefano is a recipient of the USC Associates Award for Excellence in Teaching, 2023-2024.

Watch this 2-minute video and scroll down for the full interview, plus tips for implementing this kind of activity in your course!

Read more about this approach in Antonio’s own words:


Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download this file [256.98 KB]


Tips from CET

Some things to consider when planning oral advocacy assignments:

  1. Prepare students with skills for success. Plan time before the assignment to practice reasoning, public speaking, evidence gathering, or persuasive technique skills.
  2. Model real-world activities and roles. Select activities that reflect what students may encounter in their future professional settings such as case conferences, debates, or panel interviews.
  3. Prepare logistics. Decide if students will represent a specific viewpoint or role. Specify the structure and timing of the activity. Consider how you will use the physical space to engage all students. If you have a large class, consider different modalities, for example, group videos.
  4. Engage in strategic questioning. Encourage students to share alternative arguments and questions to motivate engagement and learning. Require students to use scholarship to support their statements and generate new questions.
  5. Assess students. Debrief each activity to help students synthesize the information presented. Provide feedback to students based on strengths and areas for improvement using a rubric. Encourage students to critique their performance through self-reflection.

References

Golding, C. (2011). Educating for critical thinking: thought-encouraging questions in a community of inquiry. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(3), 357–370. USC Libraries Link.

Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Investigating students’ engagement in chatbot-supported classroom debates. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 4917–4933. USC Libraries Link.

Nappi, J. S. (2017). The Importance of Questioning in Developing Critical Thinking Skills. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 84(1), 30-. USC Libraries Link.

Stanley, T. (2021). Promoting rigor through higher level questioning : practical strategies for developing students’ critical thinking. Routledge. USC Libraries Link.

Category:

Back to Faculty Profiles

Share: