Learning to Ask the Right Questions: A Consultant Model for Student Inquiry


In this What a Great Teaching Idea faculty profile, Zuzanna Fuchs, Assistant Professor of Linguistics at USC Dornsife, describes a consultant-style assignment that asks students to approach open-ended, real-world language problems as expert advisors. By developing hypotheses and designing methods to test them, students engage in guided inquiry that emphasizes reasoning over “right answers.” The activity helps students build confidence in analytical thinking, refine their ability to formulate precise, evidence-based arguments, and apply course concepts to complex problems across contexts.

Professor Fuchs is the recipient of the 2025-26 Dana and David Dornsife College Early-Career Award for Excellence in Teaching and the 2024-25 USC General Education Teaching Award.

Watch this 3-minute video and scroll down for the full interview, plus tips for implementing this kind of activity in your course!

Read more about this approach in Zuzanna’s own words:


Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download this file [289.17 KB]


Tips from CET

Framing scenario-based assignments as consulting activities can help students apply course concepts to real-world problems. Positioning students as experts invited to analyze a situation encourages them to think critically, justify their reasoning, and propose a thoughtful approach or solution. 

Steps to implement consultant-style scenario activities:

  1. Develop a realistic scenario connected to your course content where a person, organization, or community faces a real problem or challenge. 
  2. Position students as consultants who have been asked to analyze the situation and recommend a path forward, and let them know there is no single right solution. 
  3. Ask students to draw specifically on course concepts and materials to explain what might be causing the issue or shaping the situation. 
  4. Have students propose a strategy, plan, or set of actions that could address the problem, justifying their recommendations with reasoning, evidence, or relevant frameworks from the course.
  5. When grading the activity, use a clear rubric that evaluates the strengths of students’ analysis, application of course ideas, and clarity of their proposed solution. 

References 

Cook‐Sather, A. (2011) Layered learning: Student consultants deepening classroom and life lessons. Educational Action Research, 19(1), 41-57. USC Libraries link

Löfstrand, P., & Zakrisson, I. (2025). Exploring the impact of role-playing exercises on cognitive and emotional processes: a social- and educational psychological perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1645213. USC Libraries link

Pettenger, M., West, D., & Young, N. (2014). Assessing the impact of role-play simulations on learning in Canadian and US classrooms. International Studies Perspectives, 15(4), 491-508. USC Libraries link

Category:

Back to Faculty Profiles

Share: